Premium content
PREMIUM CONTENT
Published Jun 15, 2020
Column: UNC, Duke ADs hypocritical on NIL stance
Justin H. Williams  •  TheWolfpackCentral
Staff Writer
Twitter
@JustinHWill

Two of the highest-paid athletic directors in the ACC have spoken out in opposition of name, image and likeness (NIL) in college sports in recent weeks.

Unsurprisingly, the duo hypocritically parroted the standard cliché talking points meant to incite fear over allowing student-athletes to profit from their own identity.

North Carolina athletic director Bubba Cunningham spoke with Dennis Dodd of CBS Sports about his opposition to NIL after the news organization obtained a letter Cunningham wrote to the Uniform Law Commission expressing concerns over the latest NIL recommendations made by the NCAA’s Federal and State Legislation Working Group.

Within a week, Duke athletic director Kevin White released a statement in defense of his “colleague and friend” and echoed similar opposing viewpoints to NIL with concerns over its impacts on recruiting and non-revenue sports.

info icon
Embed content not availableManage privacy settings

The concerns of the two athletic directors stem from the NCAA’s summersault on NIL in the past year after decades of vehemently opposing any form of compensation to athletes.

At this point, it’s impossible to tell whether their hypocrisy is willful or negligent. Regardless, the blue bloods’ stances display a complete lack of self-awareness at the very least.

Sign up for a FREE 60-day trial to unlock premium NC State athletics content
Sign up for a FREE 60-day trial to unlock premium NC State athletics content
Subscribe to read more.
Unlock Premium news from the largest network of experts.
Say your piece in exclusive fan communities.
Dominate with stats, athlete data, Rivals250 rankings, and more.
Go Big. Get Premium.Log In